Saturday, September 10, 2016

Sitting to Stand

     San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick is sitting through the playing of the national anthem before his games to claim his solidarity with people who are treated unequally and unjustly in America.  Kaepernick said:
“I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color. To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder.”
     It’s a gutsy, passive protest.  By beginning his protests during the preseason when the team could have cut him, he risked his career.  The NFL could have fined him for conduct that was deemed financially or critically damaging to the league.  He risked harm to his personal reputation and his personal safety.  But, Kaepernick embraced his Constitutional right to free speech and sat.
     The 49ers coach, Chip Kelly, stood by Kaepernick, telling reporters his quarterback’s action is “his right as a citizen” and “it's not my right to tell him not to do something.”  San Francisco 49ers teammate Eric Reid and the Seattle Seahawks’ Jeremy Lane supported Kaepernick and subsequently declined to stand for the national anthem as well.
     Readers might ask why I am bringing this up in a political blog.  I am highlighting this issue because it demonstrates one of the fundamental perceptual rifts in our society.
     On the one hand, people who never experienced systematic discrimination often react angrily to Black Lives Matter protesters.  They may blame the victims of police shootings and believe media excuses that victims had alleged gang affiliations, criminal backgrounds, or “reached for a gun” rather than a wallet.  They fail to note later media reports correcting initial false information, seldom ponder injustice, and simply go on with their grumpy day.
     On the other hand, there are people who have experienced injustice.  Women who know they are receiving a lower wage than their male coworkers know injustice.  People of color who were pulled over by police because they were driving at night know injustice.  Sick, working poor people who were denied Medicaid because they “earn too much” know injustice.  People in inner cities who live at the dead end of low-wage jobs due to inadequate elementary educations know injustice.  These people may live in resentful silence knowing discrimination is alive and well in America.
     These fast-moving, diametrically opposed perceptual undercurrents fuel voter decisions.  The choices people make about whether they will vote and for whom they will vote cannot be quantified by pollsters who want to predict how voters will express their emotional realities on Election Day.  We could predict a sports figure would take a public position on current events.  We could predict people would oppose and disagree with the sports’ figure’s position.  But, we still cannot imagine the impact.
     In closing, I will do something I have never done in this blog.  In my non-blogging time, I write poetry.  (http://chairthelyonkramer.tumblr.com/).  Here’s to you, Colin.  Fight the good fight.


Sitting to Stand


A half black man sits down on a bench
And stands for all people police have shot down
In fear and unbefitting no crime.
A man with grace and athletic elegance.
A man with a college degree and a fat paycheck.
A man who became what he is today,
He is a man with a right to sit and stay.

What is more American than this protest?
Risking health and reputation and career
He stands for his countrymen by sitting down.

You so-called fans have no right to stop him.
You, armchair critics who send a football player
This latter day gladiator
Out to the grids on a Sunday
To lay down his body for your entertainment.
You want him to stand because you say so
Like all of the American Negros in our nation?
“Stand up! Roll over! Play dead!”
You make his point with your condemnation.

Mr. Man, sit where you can
Sit down, sir, please, and make your stand.


Tuesday, September 6, 2016

A Word About the 24-Hour News Cycle

     As a long-time political junkie, I have, at times, rolled out of bed at five and started my day by flipping news channels.  CNN, MSNBC, FOX, ABC, NBC, CBS. Click, click, click.  Invariably, the national news lead stories were always the same with a slightly different spin.  If you've seen three in eight minutes, you've seen them all.
     For the past several weeks, I did a little experiment.  I tuned in to some of those cable news programs where a panel is assembled to discuss the political news of the day.  Honestly, I couldn't handle it. As readers can imagine from my blogger silence, the exercise rendered me speechless,
     For hours every evening, grown professional men and women barely control themselves, take sides like children in a divorce, and talk over one another to say... What, exactly?  More often than not, it seemed the "news" panel was reporting on itself.  I'm still not sure that I caught anything resembling reasoned journalistic commentary.
     Call me old school.  News is supposed to be informative.  We are supposed to receive the who, what where, when and how about local, national, and international events.  It is our responsibility to tease out the impact of these events on our lives and our communities. Having a bunch of panelists screeching simultaneously across the space of two desks is neither informative nor entertaining to this writer.  This kind of programming feels like very irresponsible journalism.
     Therefore, I am returning to the comparative solitude of reading my news.  If I wish to know what a candidate said in a speech I will use the power of the Internet to obtain a transcript.  I will read stories from a plethora of information sources with various interpretations of the same events and then decide for myself what impact (if any) a single event will have without the interruption of eight people screaming in the background.  I have returned to a state of political junkie bliss.
     I hope you all know how much I appreciate folks who read.  Thank you for taking the time to read me.

     Now, there is a big, fat, contentious presidential election at hand and it's high time that I got back to writing about the significance of local social and economic factors' impacts on who and how we select leaders.